Tuesday, May 14, 2019

A VERY CONVENTIONAL START TO EVERY LEGAL PROCESS

I NEVER SET OUT TO BE SELF-REPRESENTED NOR DO I BUCK THE SYSTEM. I ATTENDED SCHOOL, 14 YEARS, I WORKED AT THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY FOR 7 YEARS AND I HIRED LAWYERS FIRST EACH TIME A LEGAL PROCESS BEGAN.






 

I started each ICBC case I tried by hiring or attempting to hire a lawyer first.


I did not do or say anything unlawful at any time and in my divorce negotiation. I hired Pam Murray QC who was seriously ill and Betty's Lawyer knew and stalled until she died. What bullshit is that in a negotiation. I would rather give money to my wife and kids, especially as a house to live in rather than to lawyers to fight. 

Often the weird aggressive description of myself is so far off the practical economic principles which I practice first and only. There are Millions of proofs of this. I work and invest until I am forced to fight or lose more than it costs to fight. I often have reasons to not want to have a public dispute and then as a tactic such a situation will be created and then ascribed to me. Hogwash.

SOMETHING THAT A LOT OF BLOCKHEADS WHO HAVE FOUGHT WITH ME OR BLAMED ME FOR FIGHTING FAIL TO REALIZE THAT AS AN ARTIST, WRITER, MUSICIAN, COMPOSER, VIDEOGRAPHER AND PERFORMER I DO NOT HAVE ANY INTEREST IN ALMOST ANYONE.

I AM BUSY. DO NOT FIND A PREMISE TO BOTHER ME.




                DISABLED NOT COMPENSATED:

 THIS IS AN ABSURD OUTCOME FOR VICTIMS


When you lose your ability to work, the result is poverty if you are young. It is unlikely you will have much money saved. The only thing that will save you is if you have a compensating for lost earnings provision in place. It is not right to scoff at claims of disability or inability, to deny the compensation for lost earnings package and the award of money for damages. 

This post will be continued.